Posts by Anders Andersen

Tunistic First off that sent a red flair in the sky was when early on the Chinese did a "its a US Army made virus" WTF. Who would say that except for a guilty person.

...says the person claiming "it's a Chinese Army made virus"

Does claiming "our opponent did this" properly indicate a person's/country's own guilt?

Or is it more likely just emotions and propaganda speaking?

6

Online witnessing / witness meeting

by Gorbatchov in

jw
friends

the local congregation has organized witness meetings at zoom with the field service group.. witness are advised to take part of the online witness meeting, dispite if they witness online or not.. this all to keep the routine, they say.. g..

Anders Andersen

This all to keep ~~the routine~~ control

14

Covid 19 CENSORSHIP

by The Fall Guy in

if anyone voices an opinion with which i disagree or even detest, i can either debate it or walk away.. the last thing i want is for someone to be silenced by threats.

however, it appears that some opinions on social media etc.

which contradict the official narrative are being muted.

Anders Andersen

Freedom of speech is a very important thing.

However, my freedom of speech does not mean everyone else should willingly and freely offer their platform to me to spread my speech.

Much less are platforms obliged to offer their technology and services to those who spread false or misleading messages that endanger individual people or society as a whole.

If on this forum Simon decides to remove my posts simply because he doesn't like what I write, that is not a infringement on my freedom of speech.

If YouTube or Facebook decide to remove factually incorrect messages that claim COVID-19 is caused by 5G from their platforms, that is not a violation of the freedom of speech of the people spouting such nonsense.

You and I aren't obliged to allow people who want to proclaim whatever message to do so from our living room using our telephone, or from our back yard.

Neither are large companies obliged to offer their 'living room' to let people shout dangerous nonsense.

Freedom of speech means that you can speak your mind without being arrested. That's it.

And even then our freedom of speech is limited by other people's freedoms and rights...

9

2020--04--07 Inbox Disaster relief Committee--Zone 3!

by Atlantis in

jw
friends

2020-04-07 inbox disaster relief committee zone 3.. https://docdro.id/k2wq1zj.

.

petra!.

Anders Andersen

All the critic, sometimes, they do also good things. This communication is good

I think it's telling (some) JW apparently need Watchtower to tell them they should follow CDC and government orders....

17

How are they handling the memorial this year with the Coronavirus?

by Mandi in

jw
friends

it’s cognac.

couldn’t sign-in for some reason so i created a new account.

just was wondering what’s going on with the memorial this year cause my kids father wants to have them during that time.

Anders Andersen

It's sad how JW look down on the traditions and rituals of other religions while they don't understand how much this wine and bread thing is a meaningless ritual according to their own theology.

17

How are they handling the memorial this year with the Coronavirus?

by Mandi in

jw
friends

it’s cognac.

couldn’t sign-in for some reason so i created a new account.

just was wondering what’s going on with the memorial this year cause my kids father wants to have them during that time.

Anders Andersen

I heard about a single person who asked an elder "how should I go about passing the emblems? Pass the from left hand to right hand? Or?" and the elder told them to stand up and just walk around the table on which the emblems are placed.

Not unlike a Catholic procession or a witch circle lol...

27

Need help - How do you determine whether to show a JW the truth or not?

by AlainAlam in

jw
friends

how do you determine whether to show a jw the truth or not?.

now some of you still believe in the bible.

to you the answer would be obvious - we preach to anyone as much as possible.

Anders Andersen

You can always simply ask them and check their willingness to change their mind:

Is it important to you to believe true things?
Suppose someone is convinced of something that is not true. How can they find out?
Hypothetically, imagine what JW believe isn't true at all, would you want to know?
What kind of evidence might convince you your (religious) beliefs are not correct?
Etc...

Their answers tell you all you need to know.

45

What do you think of the ransom as proof of Jehovah's love?

by AlainAlam in

consider these excerpts from the bible and the publications:.

“no one has love greater than this, that someone should surrender his life in behalf of his friends” (joh 15:13).

“for hardly would anyone die for a righteous man; though perhaps for a good man someone may dare to die.

Anders Andersen

As far as I can read from the Bible, Christians are expected to be forgiving, because that's loving. If they would make people jump through hoops before they would forgive them, or if they would demand retribution or repayment, that would not be ok behavior. Being forgiving without hesitation is seen as a virtue. The whole ransom idea makes it appear to me God isn't really forgiving in the way he expects his worshippers to be forgiving? He demands violent repayment from us for something that we didn't even cause. He is unable of refuses to amend his own rules and let love trump legalism. Such a god seems inferior to humans in this regard.

And according to the Bible, death is the proper punishment for being a sinner. That means that after a person died, God could simply resurrect that person as (another) gift of life. After all, the dead have already paid their dues. They are no more in debt than they were before they were born. God wouldn't need really need a ransom to do gift them life again, right?

Here's an interesting scenario that just popped into my mind: what if God would resurrect everyone who died, as a perfect human? No ransom would be needed, nor any kind of Armageddon. Those of the resurrected who would sin on purpose could simply be executed (like, according to JW theology, they will in Paradise).

After a few generations only perfect, God loving people would remain.

I don't see how something that wasn't really that costly to God (except for a bruise on his ego), could be avoided by choosing a more reasonable strategy, and shows an inferior way of 'forgiving' can be called 'the greatest gift'.

(Disclaimer: I answered this with JW theology in mind)

84

Do you have any evidence that the GB had bad intent?

by AlainAlam in

do you have any evidence that the gb had bad intent?

as opposed to blind faith/cognitive dissonance and honest mistakes.. i'm inclined to think they have the best of intentions and are just wrong (primarily because the bible is wrong), but i'm willing to consider the evidence otherwise..